Under what circumstance can a suspended member be ordered to surrender personally owned firearms?

The correct choice highlights the responsibility of ensuring safety for both the individual and others in the community. When a suspended member believes that they pose a danger to themselves or others, it is imperative for the law enforcement agency to take proactive measures to prevent potential harm. This scenario falls under the principle that individuals who recognize their own risk factors should not retain access to firearms until their situation is assessed and resolved.

In this context, the suspension may indicate heightened scrutiny of the member's mental or emotional state, making it critical to act accordingly to prevent any possible incidents. Such policies aim to prioritize public safety and the well-being of individuals experiencing distress.

The other options present situations that do not inherently require the immediate surrender of firearms. Being found guilty of a crime could lead to legal consequences, but doesn't necessarily prompt self-surrender without further assessment. The condition of a firearm being damaged does not warrant surrender, as this relates more to the weapon's usability rather than the member's mental state. Lastly, consistent tardiness does not correlate with firearm safety concerns, as it pertains to attendance and professionalism rather than any immediate danger posed by the member's access to firearms.