What actions are prohibited when it comes to the use of force?

The use of force within law enforcement is governed by strict guidelines and principles designed to ensure the protection of individuals' rights and maintain public safety. Removing objects from bodily orifices is considered an invasive procedure that can pose significant physical and emotional risks to a person. Such actions may violate ethical standards and constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. This level of intervention typically requires consent, medical necessity, or adherence to strict legal protocols, which are often not present in most situations.

Coercing a confession, while also highly unethical and prohibited, primarily pertains to the interrogation process and is not directly classified under physical use of force. Taking blood samples is a medical procedure that may be conducted under specific legal circumstances but needs clear justification and adherence to medical standards. Restraining a compliant individual, although problematic in some respects, does not necessarily fall under the same prohibitive actions as the physical and invasive nature of removing objects from bodily orifices.

Therefore, the correct understanding of prohibited actions in the context of use of force centers around the principle of respecting individual rights and maintaining ethical standards, reinforcing that the invasive act of forcibly removing items from a person's body is inappropriate and often illegal.