Which case law is associated with use of force?

The case of Tennessee v. Garner is significant because it deals specifically with the use of deadly force by law enforcement officers. In this landmark ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing suspect is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

This case draws a clear line regarding when and how police officers can employ deadly force, emphasizing the need for a balance between the government’s interest in capturing suspects and individuals' rights against unreasonable seizures. The ruling established important guidelines for law enforcement agencies nationwide, ensuring they operate within constitutional boundaries when it comes to the use of force.

In contrast, the other cases mentioned relate to different legal issues—Miranda v. Arizona involves the rights of accused individuals during police interrogations, Roe v. Wade pertains to reproductive rights and privacy, and Brown v. Board of Education addresses racial segregation in public schools. None of these cases specifically focus on the parameters of use of force in law enforcement, making Tennessee v. Garner the most relevant choice regarding that topic.